Magnesium Carbonate

Evidence Level: L3 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Magnesium Carbonate
  2. Magnesium Carbonate: From Antacid Use (Original Indication Not Recorded) to Active Peptic Ulcer Disease
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. South Africa Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Magnesium Carbonate: From Antacid Use (Original Indication Not Recorded) to Active Peptic Ulcer Disease

One-Sentence Summary

Magnesium carbonate is an acid-neutralising antacid ingredient. The South African registration record does not state its original indication. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for active peptic ulcer disease, but there are no registered clinical trials and only 4 publications for this indication. None of the publications test magnesium carbonate on its own.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not stated in the SAHPRA licence data
Predicted New Indication Active peptic ulcer disease
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.96%
Evidence Level L3
South Africa Market Status Marketed
Number of SAHPRA Registrations 1
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available. Based on known pharmacology, magnesium carbonate is an antacid that buffers gastric acid. Mechanistically, it may relieve ulcer symptoms and support healing by raising gastric pH.

Antacids were used for peptic ulcer disease before H2 blockers and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) became standard. This is therefore largely an established antacid use, not a novel repurposing discovery. The high TxGNN score most likely reflects that known link.

Modern care (PPIs and H. pylori eradication) has largely replaced antacid-based ulcer healing. Any new role would probably be adjunctive symptom relief.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered for active peptic ulcer disease.


Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
7034155 1981 RCT Scand J Gastroenterol 72 patients with duodenal or prepyloric ulcer. An antacid/anticholinergic combination was compared with cimetidine and placebo. At 3 weeks, healing was 67% with cimetidine (p<0.005 vs placebo) and 50% with the antacid combination. This is not magnesium carbonate alone.
6755656 1982 RCT Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl Antacid/anticholinergic, cimetidine and placebo in active prepyloric and duodenal ulcers. No abstract is available.
3003883 1985 RCT Scand J Gastroenterol 80 patients with duodenal ulcer, all on one antacid tablet four times daily. High-fibre vs low-fibre diet gave healing of 67.5% vs 60% at 4 weeks (not significant). It tests the diet, not the antacid.
35720246 2022 In vitro / product evaluation Med Pharm Rep Laboratory evaluation of the acid-neutralising capacity of antacids marketed in Morocco. No patient outcomes.

South Africa Market Information

Registration Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
Reg. No. 45/24/0919 Osvaren Film-coated tablet (Fct) Not stated in the licence data

Essential Medicines List (EML) status is not available in the evidence pack.

The registered product is a film-coated tablet with no recorded indication. To my recollection, Osvaren is a calcium acetate/magnesium carbonate phosphate binder rather than an antacid. This should be checked against the SAHPRA Professional Information (PI). If correct, the registered product and indication differ from the antacid use in the ulcer literature.


Safety Considerations

Please refer to the SAHPRA-approved Professional Information (PI) for safety information. Report adverse drug reactions to SAHPRA.

The drug interaction query returned no results, which is more likely missing data than proof of no interactions. Magnesium accumulation in renal impairment, and chelation-type interactions with co-administered oral drugs, should be assessed before any new use.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale:

  • The ulcer literature covers mixed antacid products and old comparators (cimetidine, ranitidine), so the effect of magnesium carbonate alone cannot be isolated. No clinical trials are registered.
  • The SAHPRA safety data and the original indication are missing. PPIs and H. pylori eradication are now standard care.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • The SAHPRA PI (warnings, contraindications, approved indication, product composition) for Osvaren
  • Confirmation of whether the registered product has any antacid use
  • Mechanism of action data from DrugBank
  • Trials or studies of magnesium carbonate alone, or a current-standard-of-care comparison
  • A safety assessment for renal impairment and drug interactions

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.