Cyproterone Acetate

Evidence Level: L4 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Cyproterone Acetate
  2. Cyproterone Acetate: From Hormonal (Antiandrogen/Progestin) Therapy to Migraine Disorder
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. South Africa Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Cyproterone Acetate: From Hormonal (Antiandrogen/Progestin) Therapy to Migraine Disorder

One-Sentence Summary

Cyproterone acetate (CPA) is a progestin and antiandrogen, used in South Africa in combined tablet products. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for migraine disorder, but there are no registered clinical trials and only 3 loosely related publications, none testing CPA as a migraine treatment.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not stated in the SAHPRA records retrieved (indication text is blank for all 4 registrations)
Predicted New Indication Migraine disorder
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.66%
Evidence Level L4
South Africa Market Status Marketed
Number of SAHPRA Registrations 4
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the Evidence Pack. CPA is known as a progestin and antiandrogen, so its main pharmacology is hormonal.

Hormonal fluctuation, especially oestrogen withdrawal, is a recognised migraine trigger, so a hormonal link is plausible. A 2003 review reports that progestins interact with GABA-A receptors and dopamine and opioid systems. It also notes that CPA increases dopaminergic responses and binds opiate receptors independently of its classical effects. This is the only mechanistic clue in the evidence, and it is indirect.

No study has tested CPA as a migraine treatment. The TxGNN score comes from a knowledge-graph prediction only. The safety direction also needs care: migraine with aura is a recognised caution for combined hormonal contraceptives because of stroke risk.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
14670648 2003 Review Maturitas Progestins act on GABA-A, dopamine and opioid systems; CPA increases dopaminergic responses and binds opiate receptors
12390622 2002 Cohort Headache Compares three oral hormone replacement schemes and their effect on migraine in postmenopausal women; not a CPA study
10857213 2000 Review Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie Long-term side effects of CPA-containing gynaecological therapy, including the debate on mutagenic potential; no migraine data

None of these papers shows that CPA prevents or treats migraine.

South Africa Market Information

Registration Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
Reg. No. 29/21.8.2/0685 Minerva Tablet Not provided in retrieved record
Reg. No. 38/21.8.2/0248 Adco-Fem 35 Tablet Not provided in retrieved record
Reg. No. 38/21.8.2/0055 Diva-35 Tablet Not provided in retrieved record
Reg. No. 33/21.8.2/0185 Ginette Tablet Not provided in retrieved record

All products are oral tablets. Essential Medicines List status could not be determined from the data.

Safety Considerations

  • Thromboembolic risk (from the literature retrieved for this drug): Studies of CPA/ethinyl estradiol contraceptives report increased venous thromboembolism risk, prothrombotic changes and higher thrombin generation. The risk is especially notable with factor V Leiden.
  • Migraine with aura: This is a recognised caution for combined hormonal contraceptives because of stroke risk. In a migraine population, the safety signal points toward harm rather than benefit.

Please refer to the SAHPRA-approved Professional Information (PI) for full safety information. Report adverse drug reactions to SAHPRA.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: There are no trials and no CPA-specific migraine literature, so the prediction rests on the TxGNN score and an indirect hormonal rationale. The thrombosis and stroke-risk signals for CPA-containing combined products count against use in migraine, especially migraine with aura.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • SAHPRA package insert warnings and contraindications (blocking for safety screening)
  • Mechanism of action data (for example from DrugBank)
  • Any CPA-specific migraine study, or a formal benefit-risk review
  • Note: among the other predictions in this pack, amenorrhoea has the strongest support (evidence level L3, including a Phase 4 study of ethinyl estradiol/CPA in menstrual irregularity of hyperandrogenic origin). It may be a better-supported direction to review first.

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.